A history painting is NEVER done . . .
I've often joked that the moment I declare a
history painting "done", and put the last flourishes on my signature
in the lower corner, someone will show me a long, lost letter, chock full of
juicy, new facts that turn our previous ideas on their collective heads.
This is what we history painters both dread AND desire.
Well . . . it finally happened . . .
On the evening of July 1st, Pat and I unveiled
"The Charge" at Gettysburg, in front of a room full of appreciative
Minnesotans. I joked to the crowd that a painting is never done until my
wife wrenches the brush and palette out of my hand. I showed them my “Artistic
License” (courtesy of Kenspeckle Press), and then went on to remind them that
this painting is just MY interpretation, subject to change.
(photo courtesy of Pioneer Press http://www.pioneerphotography.com)
On the evening of July 2nd, we spent time with
fellow Minnesotans on the battlefield and participated in the rededication of
the First Minnesota Regiment Monument on the spot where they initiated their
charge, 150 years ago.
(photo courtesy of Pioneer Photography http://www.pioneerphotography.com)
That night, my friend, Wayne Jorgenson - a founder of the First
Minnesota Reenactment group, author, historian and collector- showed me
the transcript of an unpublished letter written by a member of the First
Minnesota Regiment who had actually participated in that famous action. This
letter suggested that the opposing Minnesotans and Alabamans were farther apart
than most accounts presented; that they stood up, without shelter, on opposite
sides of Plum Run; and that there was no bayonet combat.
Keep in mind that this letter was written by a soldier on the left end of the line, so his experience was limited to his narrow perspective. A common experience amongst combat veterans was to develop tunnel vision - they can generally only recall what happened immediately around them. I feel the safest approach is to incorporate as much as possible from the accounts of all the participants.
Keep in mind that this letter was written by a soldier on the left end of the line, so his experience was limited to his narrow perspective. A common experience amongst combat veterans was to develop tunnel vision - they can generally only recall what happened immediately around them. I feel the safest approach is to incorporate as much as possible from the accounts of all the participants.
SOOOO . . . here we go, kids!
Change 1
It
seems, according to my expert historian friends, that Colonel Colvill and the Regiment's National
Colors would have been farther to the right of the line, as opposed to dead center
– no pun intended. I fear the reasons for this might bore you to tears, but I like these details. With the recent dispatch of a company to skirmish with approaching rebels, Colvill may not have had time to reposition the color party to the center of the regiment. Like Colvill, I also have ordered these men to "Charge Bayonets", and am in the process of pulling their muskets off their shoulders and into a more threatening position.
Changes 2 and 3
I have pushed BACK two regiments of Alabamans – the First Minnesota
fought hard to do this, but I managed to wipe them out in mere minutes with my
paintbrush. Putting them back into
their NEW positions will take some time, however. This change is needed in order to create more space between
the opposing sides, to delineate the separate Alabama regiments and to further distinguish
them from the scrubby trees and brush along Plum Run.
Historically, these Alabamans were becoming intermingled by this point in the fight, but I need to
fudge that fact just a bit to help tell the story. This where my "Artistic License" comes in mighty handy.
Now, where did I put all that gray and butternut
paint?